Disappointed in this response. You're allowing games to be designed by AI but not written or drawn by it. Totally the wrong way round in my mind. I primarily just want the idea to be human.
I appreciate the logic in the post and your reasoning is sound, but you're simply going to stifle creativity with this rule not improve it.
I think having a tag is the best option. People who loath AI can avoid and the majority who are ambivalent or neutral can look at it.
Games cannot be designed by AI. I suppose you could ask an LLM to create a game, then rewrite it and do artwork for it and nobody would know. That seems pointless imo.
Great presentation, and thanks for keeping the jam free of it
I see it as a bunch of friends happily meeting up to play chess, imagine one bringing out the laptop with a chessbot “just to see a couple ideas while we play”…
Disappointed in this response. You're allowing games to be designed by AI but not written or drawn by it. Totally the wrong way round in my mind. I primarily just want the idea to be human.
I appreciate the logic in the post and your reasoning is sound, but you're simply going to stifle creativity with this rule not improve it.
I think having a tag is the best option. People who loath AI can avoid and the majority who are ambivalent or neutral can look at it.
Games cannot be designed by AI. I suppose you could ask an LLM to create a game, then rewrite it and do artwork for it and nobody would know. That seems pointless imo.
Great presentation, and thanks for keeping the jam free of it
I see it as a bunch of friends happily meeting up to play chess, imagine one bringing out the laptop with a chessbot “just to see a couple ideas while we play”…
Cant wait for this years jam